Back to blog

Marketing Resource Planning | How to Allocate People and Effort Across Campaigns

祖父江仁

マーケティングのリソース計画|人員と工数をキャンペーンに配分する方法

The budget is allocated, but who works on what gets decided by feel. Once the quarter starts, particular people end up carrying several campaigns and everything slows down. Marketing resource planning is difficult because human capacity behaves differently from budget. This article covers the judgments involved in allocating people and effort across campaigns.

The Decisive Difference from Budget Allocation

A premise worth settling first. Human capacity cannot be treated the way budget is.

It cannot be carried over

Budget unspent this month can sometimes roll into next month. Human capacity simply disappears. Ten person-days going unused this month does not add ten person-days to next month.

So anything left idle is a straight loss, and any shortfall cannot be made up later. The habit of adjusting across the year, which works for budget, does not apply here. That is what makes resource planning hard.

It cannot be substituted

A million yen can go to any campaign; a person cannot. A designer being free does not fill a gap in paid media operations.

Judge from the total alone — "the team has forty person-days spare, so we are fine" — and one particular role becomes the bottleneck at execution. Allocation has to be examined role by role.

Effort Takes a Different Shape by Campaign Type

Sorting campaigns by type before allocating makes the plan easier to build.

Ongoing campaigns

Paid media, social, email — work that needs a steady level of attention throughout the period. Effort arrives at roughly the same volume every week.

The thing to watch is that this capacity does not disappear until you stop the campaign. When adding something new, what you actually have available is the remainder after subtracting the existing ongoing work.

One-off campaigns

Events, campaigns, site builds — work with a start and an end. Effort concentrates in specific periods.

Knowing where the peaks fall matters. For the same total effort, whether the peaks overlap or spread out changes how many people you need.

Unplanned work

Capacity that never appears in the plan but always materialises. Requests from other departments, incident response, urgent material to prepare.

Leave this out of the plan and the plan will break. Deriving a percentage from past experience and reserving it as a block up front is the realistic approach.

How to Allocate

  1. Work out the usable effort: take headcount times working days, then subtract meetings and administration. 70 to 80 percent utilization is the realistic level.
  2. Subtract ongoing work and unplanned work first: secure the capacity you cannot stop. What remains is what new campaigns can use.
  3. Lay the one-off campaigns out on a timeline: check where the peaks of effort land.
  4. Check surplus and shortfall by role: not in total, but by design, operations, analysis, and so on.
  5. Decide what happens to the overflow: move the timing, outsource, or drop it.

The order in step two matters. Fill in the new campaigns first and the plan completes without anyone noticing that the existing operations have been squeezed.

Handling Split Assignments

On a marketing team, one person holding several campaigns is normal. There is a trap here.

Arithmetically, one person can be split 0.5, 0.3, and 0.2 across three campaigns. In practice, every switch between campaigns costs time to change mental context.

As a guide, three concurrent campaigns per person is the ceiling. Past four, the switching cost stops being negligible and every campaign slows down.

If you must split, split by period

Even when the same person holds three campaigns, dividing the period reduces the switching. Concentrate on campaign A in the first half, then move to campaign B.

Concentrating in sequence over defined periods gets more done than sitting at 0.3 on three campaigns permanently, for the same total effort.

How Plans Typically Break

  • Interruptions are not counted: requests from sales and material demanded by executives always arrive outside the plan.
  • Revision rounds are not allowed for: creative work never passes first time. Review and revision cycles take 20 to 30 percent of the effort.
  • Growth in ongoing work goes unnoticed: every added campaign stacks up fixed capacity, leaving less room for anything new.

The third gets missed most. A campaign launched six months ago that is still running is still consuming capacity every month. Without a periodic review and a decision to stop things, you eventually have no effort left for anything new.

Three Options When It Overflows

When the allocation shows there is not enough effort, only three moves exist.

  • Move the timing: the least disruptive option, though some campaigns lose their window.
  • Outsource: requires budget, and the management effort stays in-house.
  • Drop it: the hardest to choose, and the most reliable.

What gets overlooked in the second is that outsourcing leaves the management effort behind. Direction and review still happen in-house. Not all of it lifts away.

Presenting these three to the stakeholders and drawing out a decision is where the resource planner's job ends. Take it away as "we will find a way to do everything" and everything ends up half-finished at execution.

Frequently Asked Questions

At what granularity should we plan?

Monthly is the practical unit. Weekly improves accuracy but the maintenance effort makes it unsustainable. Quarterly hides the overlapping peaks.

Our effort estimates are always wrong

You are probably not recording actuals. Knowing how many person-days a similar past campaign took improves accuracy considerably. Start rough — just record the actuals of campaigns as they finish.

How much should we reserve for unplanned work?

It varies widely by team, so deriving it from your own history is safest. If you want a starting point, set aside 10 to 20 percent of the total and adjust based on whether it holds.

Does adding people solve it?

In the short term it makes things slower, because bringing new members up to speed consumes existing members' time. Adding headcount works for plans looking several months out. It will not fill this month's shortfall.

Keeping the Plan Alive

A resource plan is not finished once it is built. It has to be set against actual consumption, with the gaps found and adjusted continuously.

When the plan lives in a spreadsheet, the actuals in timesheets, and campaign progress in yet another tracker, every reconciliation means re-keying. Xtrategy manages campaign schedules alongside budget and KPIs on a single screen, so you can track several campaigns at once.

Summary

  • Human capacity cannot be carried over, and cannot be substituted across roles.
  • Sort campaigns into ongoing, one-off, and unplanned.
  • Subtract ongoing and unplanned work first, then allocate what remains to new campaigns.
  • Three concurrent campaigns per person is the ceiling. If you must split, split by period.
  • Check surplus and shortfall by role, not in total.
  • When it overflows, choose between moving the timing, outsourcing, and dropping it.

What helps most in resource planning is getting the usable effort right. Take headcount times working days at face value and you will always come up short. Start by counting how much your existing ongoing campaigns consume each month.

Back to blog